GPA logo
Title Bar
GPA Image
QUICK LINKS

GPA SPONSORS

JOIN GPA

SUBSCRIBE eNEWSLETTER

GPA JOB POSTINGS

 

ANNOUNCEMENTS

 
CMP for AICP MEMBERS
Find more on "How to Log Your AICP CM Credits", download the PDF Instructions.
 
GPA MEMBERSHIP INFO!
Don’t risk missing out on important information from the GPA & APA. Please make sure APA has your current contact information. You must make all changes to your contact information on the APA Website. GPA is not able to update contact information.
 
Current News
Accessory Dwelling Units: An Undervalued Affordable Housing Option
By Le’Var Rice

Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs), also known as granny flats or in-law suites are defined as independent, complete living units created from surplus space, or added in inconspicuous ways, within single family homes or detached structures. Since their inception in the early 20th century, ADUs have been viewed as both a good source of supplemental income for homeowners and an affordable housing alternative for many residents within a community. Following a sharp decline in the latter part of the century, ADUs are again gaining popularity largely in response to an affordable housing crisis that is affecting many cities nationwide.

ADUs are often viewed negatively by local governments for fear that they will tarnish the character of neighborhoods; however they offer many benefits to residents and businesses located within a community. Low and moderate-income residents benefit by the increase in affordable housing options that might otherwise not exist if not for the implementation of ADUs. Property owners benefit by the additional income provided to them by the ADU occupants. Young and/or single persons who cannot afford to own a home have an attractive alternative to apartment life while saving money for a home purchase. Elderly persons may want to live an accessory unit that is secondary to the home of one of their children. Middle agers may want to have an ADU if they are frequently out of town in order to have someone looking after the primary dwelling. ADUs can also have a significant impact on the local economy because ADU residents generally provide more revenue to small businesses located in the immediate area.

ADUs address smart growth concerns for communities by promoting a more efficient use of land and available infrastructure and resources. They are used often in new urbanism or traditional neighborhood developments as a means to allow more diverse housing types. As the demand for affordable housing increases, communities must consider a variety of housing options for their citizens; ADUs represent a sensible, practical solution to increasing the affordable housing supply without a significant need for property and infrastructure investment. ADUs address issues of sprawl as well in that they are often encouraged in older, more stable neighborhoods decreasing the need to construct housing on previously undeveloped tracts of land. ADUs also address sustainability concerns because they provide property owners with supplemental income, increasing the likelihood that they can remain in their homes for longer periods of time. Also, with the additional income, property owners have more money to invest in the upkeep and maintenance of the property, decreasing the likelihood that the property will depreciate.

While ADUs are a valuable tool for increasing affordable housing options, they must also be regulated and enforced to ensure that negative consequences do not occur. Issues relating to parking, traffic, occupancy, ownership, design, approval and certification must all be addressed from the outset when considering ADU implementation. For communities new to the ADU process, it’s often best practice that they adopt more restrictive language in their ADU ordinance while communities that have some history with ADUs may choose to relax their requirements. The American Association of Retired Persons (AARP) model ordinance for ADUs appears to be very complete and a good place to begin a conversation on how ADUs may be regulated.

ADUs are a viable affordable housing option that can fit into the fabric of neighborhoods and communities well with sufficient enforcement and public oversight. ADUs provide an excellent housing option for non-traditional households including senior citizens, students and the disabled community. A number of communities in Georgia already permit accessory units and this housing option should be considered as affordable housing needs increase in the future.


Committee Volunteers Needed!

The Georgia Planning Association recently created a Planning Official Development Committee. The purpose of the committee is to provide input about and plan for training for planning commissioners and other appointed planning officials across the state. While the committee will likely need one face-to-face meeting, most of the work can be conducted through email conversations. Please contact Kellie Brownlow at kbrownlow@atlantaregional.com if you are interested in serving on this committee..

District Highlights

District 5 – Remembering Historic Preservation in Planning and Downtown Revitalization Efforts
submitted by Kristina Harpst, District 5 Director

In 2007, the American Planning Association launched its Great Places in America initiative, a program celebrating places of exemplary character, quality and planning. Most, if not all, of APA’s 2007 designated Great Places, have a common bond—each has a strong historic preservation ethic; and employs this ethic as a foundation for downtown revitalization and community development efforts. With May being Historic Preservation Month, this is a timely topic.

In Georgia, downtown revitalization has been greatly supported by State and Federal Historic Preservation Tax Incentives which, in 2006, spurred $74 million dollars in private investment. Recognizing the value of strong historic preservation tax incentives, Representative Allen Peake of Macon sponsored House Bill 851, which strengthens the state tax credit for the rehabilitation of historic properties. HB 851 has passed both the House and Senate and is now awaiting Governor Purdue’s signature. The successful passage of HB 851 will be especially beneficial to smaller Georgia communities, many with limited resources, to garner momentum and support for downtown revitalization projects.

While many small, mid-size and rural middle Georgia communities are just now beginning to tap into historic preservation tax incentives, they have been proactively using other historic preservation tools and techniques to spur greater investment in the downtown commercial centers. These communities recognize that historic preservation is not about halting growth or preserving a moment in time, but rather about utilizing the buildings and structures that have shaped their community identity to achieve places that are vibrant, adaptable and sustainable.

The following are only a few of middle Georgia communities that are utilizing the historic built environment as an essential component of downtown revitalization strategies. The Cities of Forsyth, Fort Valley and Hawkinsville are all either Better Hometowns or Main Street communities and none of them has a city planner on staff; the communities rely on the support and efforts of mayors and city council members, historic preservation commissions, zoning officials, chambers and development authorities and dedicated citizens.

ForsythCity of Forsyth (Monroe County): In 2006, Forsyth was named one of Georgia’s first Signature Communities, a designation that is accompanied by limited funding to complete community projects. The city installed Wi-Fi on the courthouse square and adopted corridor overlay design guidelines to promote compatible infill construction and to protect the character of the city’s entrance corridors (which are lined with historic structures). The city was also named a Certified Local Government in 2007 and is diligently working toward the establishment of a local commercial historic district and developing historic district design guidelines.

Fort ValleyCity of Fort Valley (Peach County): The City of Fort Valley has a number of downtown improvement projects, all related to historic structures, that were either recently completed or currently underway including: the rehabilitation of the Austin Theatre into a community venue for performing arts, meetings, and events; the Evans Building, located on a prominent downtown corner rehabilitated for use by Fort Valley State University; and the freight depot, currently undergoing rehabilitation with the assistance of Transportation Enhancement funding. To maintain its current downtown redevelopment momentum the city is in the process of listing its downtown commercial and industrial buildings on the National Register of Historic Places, this will enable building owners within the district to tap into the State and Federal historic preservation tax incentives, a resource currently unavailable to downtown property owners.

HawkinsvilleCity of Hawkinsville (Pulaski County): It began with the Opera House rehabilitation in 2000 which led to streetscape improvements, listing of the Commercial and Industrial District on the National Register and an overall renewed interest in downtown. During the winter of 2007, the city designated a local historic commercial district. Since then a number of downtown buildings have either made signage or façade improvements or have begun complete renovations. Most exciting of all is the work at the former Pillowtex Cotton Mill, located at the edge of downtown overlooking the Ocmulgee River. A private development corporation is working closely with the city to rehabilitate the historic mill into loft apartments and a community market using historic perseveration and low-income housing tax incentives.

These three success stories are indicative of how essential historic preservation is to planning and downtown revitalization efforts. As internationally recognized real estate and economic development expert, Donovan Rypkema points out, he “is unable to identify a single example of a sustained success story in downtown revitalization where historic preservation wasn’t a key component of that strategy; [whereas], examples of very expensive failures in downtown revitalization have nearly all had the destruction of historic buildings as a major element.”

Planner's Toolbox

Main Article
www.planning.org (keywords Accessory Dwelling Units)
www.dca.state.ga.us/toolkit/ToolDetail.asp?GetTool=60
www.smartgrowth.com (keywords Accessory Dwelling Units)

District Highlight
www.cityofforsyth.net/cityhall.php
www.fortvalleyusa.com/
www.hawkinsvillega.net/
www.mgrdc.org/code/

Upcoming News

June 4–7, 2008
Sustainable Zoning and Development Controls, Affordable Housing, Transit-Oriented Development Design, Conflict Management Chicago, IL
for more information please visit the website at www.planning.org/pts/

May 2, 2008
Southface – Sustainable Atlanta Roundtable, Atlanta, GA
for more info please visit their website at www.southface.org

June 6, 2008
Southface – Sustainable Atlanta Roundtable, Atlanta, GA
for more info please visit their website at www.southface.org

June 21 – 24, 2008
GMA Annual Convention, Savannah, GA
for more info please visit their website at www.gmanet.com

July 11, 2008
Southface – Sustainable Atlanta Roundtable, Atlanta, GA
for more info please visit their website at www.southface.org

Visit the GPA Calendar of Events website page for a full listing...

If you are experiencing difficulty reading this email, please visit the web page HERE.
You are currently subscribed as [[email]].
You may Unsubscribe or Update Your Records.

© Copyright 2008. Georgia Planning Association.
817 West Peachtree St, Suite 770
Atlanta, GA 30308